AI咨询

每日早报 投融资 最新技术 行业应用 大模型进展

AI知识

AI工具库 AI智能体 AI编程 Hermes 使用 Codex 使用 Claude Code 学习路径 Prompt模板库

AI应用

最佳实践 企业落地 AI赚钱 OPC 一人公司 落地SOP AI成熟度诊断 咨询预约

其他

AI 问答 关于本站
首页 / 最新技术 / 正文

语言模型的安全纠错:冻结基座调整与能力保持

事件

arXiv:2609.16145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study a practical question: can a small correction module fix errors in a frozen language model's outputs without degrading its base capabilities? We propose CRN v2, a lightweight logit-level correction module (~34M trainable parameters, 0.73% of the 4.65B text module) that sits atop a fully frozen Gemma 4 E2B model. The base model is never updated; only the correction module learns, via supervised fine-tuning followed by reference-free DPO on 83,400 error-correction pairs. On a 60-question domain exam (CEHRI: Certified Human-Robot Intelligence, covering facts, arithmetic, and implicit-goal reasoning), CRN v2 corrects 53.3% of base-model errors (reworded variant: 43.3%) while showing no degradation on tested capability benchmarks (MMLU/BoolQ N=200; car-wash N=8). A LoRA baseline at the matched CRN v1 budget (6.6M params, rank 19) achieves 83.3% correction but suffers 30-75% capability loss on the same benchmarks -- the correction-capability tradeoff. An ablation shows that the KL preservation term (lambda=0.1) is critical: lowering it to 0.01 degrades correction to 35.0%. A hidden-state injection variant at earlier layers (1.6M params, SFT-only) reaches 50.0%/55.8% but does not exceed logit correction; shallower injection (layer 4) drops to 30.0%/28.3%; multi-depth logit correction (~35M) reaches only 40%; and longer training (5,000 SFT + 2,000 DPO) stays at 53.3% -- none of the alternative configurations we tested exceeded t

来源

本条目由采集管线自动抓取并发布,完整内容见下方来源链接。

*采集源:arXiv cs.AI*

📎 原始来源:arXiv cs.AI
本站内容为摘要与观点整理,不全文转载原文;版权归原作者所有。
💬 对这篇还有疑问?

直接问 AI,回答带站内出处。

就这篇提问

相关内容